User talk:B137

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, B137!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:30, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks[edit]

Hi, Many thanks for barnstar :) Ammar shaker (talk) 11:42, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Letchworth State Park in autumn.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Letchworth State Park in autumn.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok, the big chromatic aberration in the middle of the image is acceptable Face-smile.svg --Cccefalon 19:25, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Forced perspective buildings 200mm focal length.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forced perspective buildings 200mm focal length.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Medium69 14:36, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Brickell skyline 2012.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brickell skyline 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:08, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

One Biscayne Tower antenna mast.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! One Biscayne Tower antenna mast.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Sorry, I can't review this image. There are three different versions in the history and a mysterious note at the image. --XRay 17:45, 20 November 2015 (UTC) There was a Commons issue with the rendering at full size, showing the old image, so I reverted it to the old revision so it would let me upload the new image by itself. --B137 23:09, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good.- This image is OK. But please don't exchange the image. This is a new one. Next please withdraw the old image and nominate the new one. Thanks. And please add a location in the description and the categories. --XRay 14:02, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Window washing high rise difference.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Window washing high rise difference.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Medium69 22:23, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

View down country road in May.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View down country road in May.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Code 06:59, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
American Airlines Arena night cropped.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! American Airlines Arena night cropped.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:20, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rotunda in the Pennsylvania State Capitol Building.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotunda in the Pennsylvania State Capitol Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 11:40, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Miami Tower cropped.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Miami Tower cropped.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:CITT summit poster.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:CITT summit poster.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  British English  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Dream out loud (talk) 07:18, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RENFE Class 103 Paracuellos de la Ribera.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RENFE Class 103 Paracuellos de la Ribera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
a bit too overprocessed, but acceptable for QI, IMO --Hubertl 10:38, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

COM:OVERCAT[edit]

Hi – first of all, thanks for your many great content uploads! Categorising files related to transit in South Florida, I noticed that you sometimes put files both in specific categories and their parent categories, as you've done here. One categorisation principle here on Commons is that files are ideally only located in the most specific categories available. For example, an image of an apple in Miami should only be categorised in apples in Miami, not fruit in Miami (it may however be categorised both in fruit in Miami and apples in Florida if an apples in Miami category does not yet exist). Thanks again!    FDMS  4    16:40, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical cyclone track maps[edit]

Please upload the versions with track lines. Thank you. Master of Time (talk) 18:40, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Selfie collage of blank memes.jpg[edit]

català  Deutsch  English  español  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Selfie collage of blank memes.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:24, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Selfie at 20, Myrtle Beach.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Selfie at 20, Myrtle Beach.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:JVC DLA-X550R (4K projector).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:JVC DLA-X550R (4K projector).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 11:32, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:4K Blu Ray early Best Buy release.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:4K Blu Ray early Best Buy release.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ViperSnake151 (talk) 19:43, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tight T-shirt demonstrating bulk and muscle development.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Tight T-shirt demonstrating bulk and muscle development.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ciaurlec (talk) 00:01, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tight t-shirt selfie.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Tight t-shirt selfie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ciaurlec (talk) 00:01, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cave roof blueprint Microsoft Paint.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Cave roof blueprint Microsoft Paint.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

WikiLoverFan1007 (talk) 13:50, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]